Ethel Boyd…Terri (Boyd) Davis…..Deanna L Barrett……..Brian F Davis.
Page Thirteen
Mary created this timeline, “1975-2016 outline of events”,
Below is a retyped rendition (identical language as the original, but more legible) of the original document,
Above is the existing road easement description, (AKA Tavern Creek Drive) and is also the appurtenant easement of record for road right of way and utilities for Parcel 2, AKA the Boyd Gangs property. The official owners of Parcel 2 are Kenneth J and Deanna L Barrett. And I believe Terri (Boyd) Davis owns a 25% interest. Or at least, at one point in time she did. She may have given it back? And her name might be Terri Davis or Terri Boyd-Davis. Her name has changed a few time’s over the years. I write Terri (Boyd) Davis because I am not sure who she calls herself at this time. Not that it matters, however, it is odd to me.
Stephen and Michelle Murphy were the first of many individuals who purchased parcels of Clark Trust property and that is why their names are listed on the above document.
Above is a survey of the existing road easement (Tavern Creek Drive) where it traverses directly over what would become parcel 2, what I call the Boyd Gangs property, and traverses around 3 sides of the Clark gravesite parcel. Tavern Creek Drive is the appurtenant easement of record for road right of way and utilities for both the Clark gravesite and Parcel 2.
Above is an image of instrument # 226223. Parcel 1 AKA Mary’s property. Parcel 1 is unique in that it was not located near or accessed by, and is not described together with and subject to, the access road, (Tavern Creek Drive), easement, as all of the other Clark trust land is including Parcel 2 (The Boyd Gang’s property).
Kari Clark put up $1,600.00 and Mary put up $400.00 for the down payment and then Mary paid off the Balance of the loan for the purchase of the above mentioned property Parcel 1 instrument # 226223. Mary has since paid all land taxes and made many improvements to her land.
Mary purchased and gave to Kari, a money order for $9000.00 in 1991. Kari in turn put a $5000.00 down payment towards the purchase of Parcel 2 and used the remaining $4000.00 to pay off Kari’s debts at that time, in order for Kari to apply for the Bank loan to cover the remaining balance for the purchase of Parcel 2. Mary then paid the vast majority of the payments on that loan until Parcel 2 was purchased in full. To Kari’s credit, she did make some of those payments, however not $4000.00 worth. So, Kari made money off of that exchange and a 50% interest in Parcel 2. And, Mary paid all of the land tax on Parcel 2 through the years up until Kari attempted to steal it from Mary in 2010. Forcing Mary to file Bonner County CV 2011-0835 partition action.
Above is an image of the original description of parcel 2 (AKA the now Boyd Gangs property) as it was originally severed from the larger Clark Trust property in 1991. Two issues stand out here. One is the fact that parcel 2 did not exist prior to 1991. Two, the original language on the deed as it was severed reads in part… “together with and subject to 30 ft. wide easement for road right of way and utilities on existing access road as surveyed…”, AKA TAVERN CREEK DRIVE,. AKA instrument #170365 easement description. This 30 ft. wide easement for road and utilities transfers with the property and does not go away. As Idaho Law clearly demands.
This easement description is inclusive on all of the Clark Trust land. The only exception is Mary’s property, (AKA parcel 1,, AKA 4687 Upper Pack River Road, Sandpoint ID 83864,,AKA 161 Tiger Lily Lane, Sandpoint, ID 83864 following the arguably illegal creation of Tiger Lily Lane).
Because Parcel 1 was Harry and Edith Clark’s residence and was not located near, nor was it served by, TAVERN CREEK DRIVE. And Parcel 1 has a unique driveway that was attached directly to the Upper Pack River Road (now a 30 wide easement over the Thornton’s land) . Also note that Parcel 2 was created in 1991. It did not exist prior to that date.
The above #416381 deed of 11/24/1992, does reserve a 30 ft. wide easement for the reminder of #226223 (Parcel 1), from the County Road across what is now the Thornton property as clearly written on the # 416381 deed. And certainly does not reserve an easement of any kind for #396781(Parcel2) which already has an appurtenant easement known as TAVERN CREEK DRIVE.
The above 1998 transaction description speaks to the Thornton Property being subject to the 1992 quitclaim deed #416381 which, remember, does reserve a 30 ft. wide easement for the reminder of #226223, (Parcel 1), across what is now the Thornton property. And does not reserve an easement of any kind for #396781, (Parcel2), which already has an appurtenant easement known as TAVERN CREEK DRIVE.
Mary and Kari did place there two parcels of land described in instrument #’s 226223 and 396781 into a revocable trust. Kari also placed her independently owned 5.3 acre parcel into that same trust as described in the following document.
The following document describes Kari’s 2010 slander of Mary’s title in there jointly owned “Parcel 2”. Kari Clark deeded herself 100% of parcel 2, without Mary’s knowledge, AKA “slander of title”
I believe that Terri (Boyd) Davis did exactly what Mary describes in her timeline 2010-# 2 above. There is no way that Kari Clark came up with that treacherous concept by herself, and I believe that she was a vulnerable adult at the time, and still is to this day. And I believe that Kari is loony tune crazy and very easily manipulated by the Boyd Gang.
I believe that Kari is a victims of the Boyd gang and yet believes that they are on her side somehow.
During the late summer of 2010, Mary received an envelope that contained a deed describing Mary’s 50% interest in Parcel 1 and with no mention of what happened to Parcel 2. Mary learned of Kari’s fraud when she went to the Bonner County recorders office and found Kari’s slander of title of Mary’s 50% interest in Parcel 2.
Mary wrote to Kari and ask that she give it back and got no response from Kari. Mary wrote to Kari again, and again got no response.
Mary had no choice but to file a partition action AKA Bonner County CV 2011-835 in order to protect Mary’s property rights against Kari’s blatant slander of title. A year had past and Kari made no effort to make it right. There is no evidence of Mary trying to take the land from Kari.
It was following Mary’s filing of CV 2011-0835 in 2011, that Kari, with the help and guidance of the Boyd Gang again, created and filed a corrective deed, taking back her blatant slander of title against Mary as described in the following deed, recorded on 8/5/2011.
This email below was sent by Terri Boyd-Davis to Toby McLaughlin. McLaughlin represented Jim and Nellie Gilbertson in Bonner County CV 2010-703. Read this email here, I believe that Terri Boyd Davis accuses Nellie and Mary of doing what Terri (Boyd) Davis and the other Boyd Gang members are very guilty of. And I believe that she attempts to extort the Gilbertsons with this.
Nellie and Jim Gilbertson were always good and kind individuals and did not deserve any of this BS. I believe that Terri (Boyd) Davis is wicked and treacherous, just like the rest of the Boyd Gang.
Furthermore, the easement to the Gilbertson’s property was and still is legitimate, despite Terri (Boyd) Davis’s statements to the contrary.
The Boyd Gang painted markings on the ground as if they were going to block the Gilbertson’s access to their home. However the “gate” was never built. The ground paint was just more harassment.
Judge Luster, given the evidence presented in the case Bonner County CV 2011-0835, in my opinion, made a proper decision in awarding Mary all of Parcel 1 and awarding Kari Parcel 2 after making a lot line adjustment between the two parcels, where in, Mary’s Parcel 1 became larger and Kari’s Parcel 2 became smaller. Even though, I know for a fact that Mary has contributed the bulk majority of money in purchasing and maintaining both of those parcels, like about 99% Mary’s part to about 1% on Kari’s part. And it could have easily been a slander of Title action instead of a partition action.
Unfortunately for Mary, she could not foresee the treachery that she would be facing and did not save all of her receipts. And, Kari did hold a 50% interest in both parcels as indicated on the deeds of record prior to Kari’s fraudulent slander of title, which resulted in Mary bringing the partition action. The lot line adjustment in Mary’s favor was a result of the receipts that Mary did exhibit with regard to maintaining and improving the properties in question.
It was when Judge luster ordered an additional 10 ft. wide easement access for parcel 2 through Mary’s front yard, I believe that was a product of fraud on the court and designed to harm Mary.
Here are some excerpts from the trial and motion transcripts from Bonner County CV 2011-0835, judge J P Luster presiding. I will break it down as we go.
Richard Kuck, attorney for Kari Clark truthfully argued before the CV 2011-0835 court.
Richard Kuck’s statement above here is accurate. Parcel 1 was severed from a larger estate and sold in 1980. Parcel 2 was severed from that same larger estate and sold in 1991.
Richard Kuck argued.
Richard Kuck accurately argues “On Parcel 1 accessed by this easement there is a house”. This easement he speaks of is the appurtenant easement of record exclusively reserved for Parcel 1, Mary’s driveway, which crosses over the Thornton property. And Mary did undertake substantial expense to improve her residence located there and at the exclusion of Kari.
I (John Pandrea) walked with Kari and Mary all over there jointly owned properties (known as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2) and on Kari’s solely owned 5+ acre property in 2002. It was then that I told Mary that I would help her renovate the old house for her. And I also told Kari that I would help her build a house for her, up on her 5+ acre property located up on the hill, (Kari said that she wanted to build a house there). Mary took me up on the offer and began to plan and purchase material.
I began my renovation project of Mary’s old house in 2004. And, it was shortly after that when Ethel Boyd and her Goons, (Boyd Gang) began there treacherous actions.
Kari never got it together at all, and instead chose to attempt to steal Mary’s property from her in 2010 at the behest of the Boyd Gang. To bad.
Richard Kuck argued…
Richard Kucks argument here is loaded with lies as follows, “Kari Clark has in fact been excluded from this property for coming up on a decade by Mary Pandrea and her son, John Pandrea”. 100% fabricated BS by Mr. Kuck. There was absolutely no evidence of that. except the lying liars who said that, Mr. Kuck’s argument here is based on those lies.
It is true that in 2012, my residence, (Mary’s house) was locked with my expensive tools and belongings inside the house and a no trespass sign was posted on the entrance to the house, however, “there’s been locked gates put up”. That argument is 100% fabricated BS. HURTFUL FRAUD. Kari was never excluded from the land.
Richard Kuck argued…
Richard Kuck argument here is fabricated. In 2012 that road,(now known as Tavern Creek Drive), that 30 ft. appurtenant easement of record for road right of way and utilities for Parcel 2, (now owned by the Boyd Gang), was a very good road that many people had been using for decades. And still use to this day in 2022. Including full size logging trucks at times in the past. And the Boyd Gang uses it as well in order to access their Parcel 2.
There are many other properties along that road (Tavern Creek Drive), other than Parcel 2, which all share that same appurtenant easement of record as parcel 2. Part of the language on the easement description for Parcel 2 is ” TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO” because the road (Tavern Creek Drive), traverses over one property and on to the next and so on, including Parcel 2, (now the Boyd Gangs property). In fact, that road has been named by Bonner County, “TAVERN CREEK DRIVE” and has always been traversable, ever since the time of its creation in the 1950’s by my grandfather, H F CLARK.
I believe that Mr. Kuck is a paid (by the Boyd Gang) liar here, and that is all. In my opinion Richard Kuck is a Court Officer and fraudster. I believe that Mr. Kuck’s argument is scurrilous and disgraceful!
Richard Kuck argued…
“I think the evidence…” The only evidence that Richard Kuck is referring to is the testimony of Terri (Boyd) Davis. She is a notorious liar and perjurer.
Terri (Boyd) Davis got up on the witness stand. Her testimony along with lawyer Richard Kuck’s arguments were solely relied upon by judge Luster in his decision to create additional access through Mary’s front yard for the benefit of Kari Clarks awarded “parcel 2”. This went against legitimate documentary evidence and truthful testimony, and I believe it went against Idaho real estate law and Bonner County ordinance.
It started with this fraudulent testimony by Terri (Boyd) Davis as Terri (Boyd) Davis was being questioned by Richard Kuck.
There is absolutely no evidence of Terri (Boyd) Davis spending more that one or two days per decade in the North Idaho area during her childhood, other than her fraudulent testimony.
It is true that she is a paralegal. It is also true that she resided and attended school in California during her childhood. Not Idaho. Most of her adult life was spent in,… not north Idaho. It was after the year 2000 that she moved to the area. She is a chronic fraud though.
Terri (Boyd) Davis goes on to testify…
This statement by Terri (Boyd) Davis. Look at the map below which clearly and accurately depicts that the only way a person could possibly circle the property, (Parcel 1 and Parcel 2), is by walking up Tavern Creek Drive, then across Parcel 2, then the forest service land, then Parcel 2 again, traversing directly along the Pack River. Terri (Boyd) Davis walked along the Pack River, walking the roadway that she walked. The lie that she tells here is the term “little trail across the property“. She is talking about the road that traverses across parcel 2 from the appurtenant easement of record for parcel 2 known as “Tavern Creek Drive“, down to the lower portion of Parcel 2 along the Pack River…
Terri (Boyd) Davis goes on to testify…
The “steep hill” she refers to is now called TAVERN CREEK DRIVE and it is a relatively steep but very accessible road, (and always has been a very accessible road, since the 1950s when it was built). And it is the appurtenant easement of record for road right of way and utilities for parcel 2 (now owned by the Boyd Gang). Terri (Boyd) Davis testified “…it comes down like this and then the ROAD turns this way.” OK, now the “little trail” is truthfully described as a “road”. She continued to testify… “And this is–you know, continues down to the water.” THAT IS TRUE. and then she testified… “but like I said, I’ve never walked to the water from there because there is no access.” THAT IS A LIE Terri (Boyd) Davis say’s the truth and a lie in the same breath and about the same location. DAM, THAT IS AMAZING! And, I can’t help but question judge Lusters part in all of this fraud on the court.
Look at the map above, Her testimony is crazy talk here. Terri (Boyd) Davis is a blatant perjurer here and that is all. Like I said, and the map accurately depicts that one could not possibly circle the property without traversing directly along the Pack River. And, it is a drive-able road the whole way. A visit to the property would prove my point.
Terri (Boyd) Davis goes on to testify…
Again, 100% false testimony, that is all.
Terri (Boyd) Davis went on to testify…
I suppose she is correct here. Walking down hill is a lot easier than walking up hill. However, if you drive your vehicle down and then back up, you would hardly know the difference.
This deed of trust document here. Notice the names on this document, testimony to their involvement in this slanderous document. Ethel Boyd, Terri Boyd-Davis, Kenneth and Deanna Barrett, Kari Clark and Lawyer, Sherly Bede. The language on this document reads in part,
Deed of Trust, Made this 10th Day of May, 2012 BETWEEN KARI A. CLARK individually and as Trustee of the Kari A . Clark Trust, u/a June 21, 2010 herein called Grantor…and KENNETH AND DEANNA BARRETT, husband and wife, here in called BENEFICIARY…
…GRANTOR does hereby irrevocably GRANT, BARGAN, SELL AND CONVEY TO TRUSTEE IN TRUST, WITH POWER OF SALE that property in the County of Bonner, State of Idaho, described as follows, and containing not more than eighty acres;…. commonly known as as 4687 Upper Pack River Road, Sandpoint, Idaho 83864…
The above document is slanderous against Mary’s property and residence, plain as day. Mary’s property and residence in 2012, when this SLANDER OF TITLE of a document was created, was commonly known as 4687 Upper Pack River Road. As accurately depicted on this Google Map below.
Below is excerpts from the so called “Corrective Affidavit” of the Barrett’s.
#3 states; “For many years and up through the current time, Kari A Clark (“Clark”) and her sister Mary E. Pandrea (“Pandrea”) have jointly owned an approximate 20 acre parcel of property…”
That is a purposeful lie. Clark and Pandrea have owned two distinct and separate parcels. one parcel, (Parcel 1) was severed (created) and purchased in 1980 and the other (Parcel 2) was severed (created) and purchased in 1991. Make no mistake, the Barratts are liars here, and under oath purposeful liars. AKA FRAUD!
# 4 states; “In 2011 Pandrea sued Clark in Bonner County district Court Case CV 2011-0835 requesting that the court order the Bonner County property sold.” This statement is another purposeful lie. More treachery on the part of the Barretts, and that is all.
Mary was attempting to preserve her property rights to her property that she has worked hard at improving and maintaining for all these years. The Barretts are ruthless thugs in my opinion. They made up that lie.
I believe that the Barretts, along with rest of the Boyd Gang are still, to this day, plotting and scheming to steal Mary’s land and residence from her any way they can, not caring about what lies they tell or what laws they break.
The Barretts involved themselves in purposeful slander of Mary’s title to her land in 2012. This fraudulent, lie filled AFFIDAVIT is par for their treacherous course.
I believe that John Thornton was misplaced in suing Mary, claiming ownership of the 1/10 acre portion of parcel 2 known as the “well piece”. Mary was awarded that portion of parcel 2 which contained the “well piece” in 0835. If Thornton would have reached out to Mary and requested that she give it to him she would have. Mary did legally own it. However, It really wasn’t all that important to her. It is a small piece of land that is located directly behind the Thornton’s residence and it makes sense that they would own it. I believe that the Boyd Gang owns it now.
I believe that the Boyd Gang acquired the “well piece” from the Throntons through Justice System Abuse” Ain’t that a bitch!
I believe that John Thornton was correct in claiming that only Parcel 1 was the dominant estate in the easement that traversed across the Thornton’s land. As all deeds of record clearly showed.
I believe that Judge Mitchell was erroneous and judicially negligent in awarding Parcel 2 Parcel 1’s easement. And it was obviously done as a direct result of fraud on his court by Terri (Boyd) Davis (witness) and then argued by Joel P. Hazel (lawyer). Both Davis and Hazel are officers of the First District Court in Kootenai County Idaho, (along with Judge Mitchel), and they knew better than to fraud the Court like they did.
And, I believe that Judge Luster’s CV-2011-0835 court was complicit to the 2012, Kari Clark and the Barrett’s slander of title against Mary.